<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments for Excel Zoom	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://excelzoom.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://excelzoom.com/</link>
	<description>...because it&#039;s more than just a calculator</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 May 2025 13:24:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		Comment on Audit Tickmark Toolbar by 10 Must Have Excel Skills for Accountants - Excel Zoom		</title>
		<link>https://excelzoom.com/audit-tickmark-toolbar-old/#comment-3793</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[10 Must Have Excel Skills for Accountants - Excel Zoom]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Dec 2024 13:58:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://excelzoom.com/?page_id=836#comment-3793</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] Audit Tickmark Toolbar [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Audit Tickmark Toolbar [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on MS Excel Data Validation for Accountants by 10 Essential Excel Tricks Every Auditor Must Know - Excel Zoom		</title>
		<link>https://excelzoom.com/ms-excel-data-validation-accountants/#comment-3792</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[10 Essential Excel Tricks Every Auditor Must Know - Excel Zoom]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Dec 2024 13:58:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://excelzoom.com/?p=3147#comment-3792</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] Data Validation for AccuracyThis is a big one! Prevent errors by restricting data input in specific cells. We have all created an awesome spreadsheet only for some user to come along and break it by inserting some invalid entry into a vital cell. It always seems to break so much more than intended too! Get around this by getting used to restricting data input (or using things like drop down lists where appropriate). For example, you can ensure that only numbers within a certain range are entered. Thank us later!How to Set It Up:Go to Data &#062; Data Validation and define your criteria.Checkout more Excel Validation Tips [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Data Validation for AccuracyThis is a big one! Prevent errors by restricting data input in specific cells. We have all created an awesome spreadsheet only for some user to come along and break it by inserting some invalid entry into a vital cell. It always seems to break so much more than intended too! Get around this by getting used to restricting data input (or using things like drop down lists where appropriate). For example, you can ensure that only numbers within a certain range are entered. Thank us later!How to Set It Up:Go to Data &gt; Data Validation and define your criteria.Checkout more Excel Validation Tips [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on Drop Down Lists Using Data Validation by 10 Essential Excel Tricks Every Auditor Must Know - Excel Zoom		</title>
		<link>https://excelzoom.com/drop-down-lists-using-data-validation/#comment-3791</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[10 Essential Excel Tricks Every Auditor Must Know - Excel Zoom]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Dec 2024 13:46:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://excelzoom.com/?p=85#comment-3791</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] than intended too! Get around this by getting used to restricting data input (or using things like drop down lists where appropriate). For example, you can ensure that only numbers within a certain range are [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] than intended too! Get around this by getting used to restricting data input (or using things like drop down lists where appropriate). For example, you can ensure that only numbers within a certain range are [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on How to Open Excel VBA Editor by How to Count Rows with VBA in Excel (5 Approaches) - ExcelDemy		</title>
		<link>https://excelzoom.com/how-to-open-excel-vba-editor/#comment-3295</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[How to Count Rows with VBA in Excel (5 Approaches) - ExcelDemy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Nov 2021 11:45:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://excelzoom.com/?p=4328#comment-3295</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] Press ALT+F11 on your keyboard. The VBA window will [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Press ALT+F11 on your keyboard. The VBA window will [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on Count Colored Cells in a List in Excel 2007 by David Bonachea		</title>
		<link>https://excelzoom.com/count-colored-cells-in-a-list-in-excel-2007/#comment-2367</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Bonachea]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2018 17:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://excelzoom.com/?p=97#comment-2367</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://excelzoom.com/count-colored-cells-in-a-list-in-excel-2007/#comment-797&quot;&gt;OddHunter&lt;/a&gt;.

Assuming all the blanks are also colored cells, 
=SUBTOTAL(103,A1:A100) + COUNTBLANK(A1:A100)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://excelzoom.com/count-colored-cells-in-a-list-in-excel-2007/#comment-797">OddHunter</a>.</p>
<p>Assuming all the blanks are also colored cells,<br />
=SUBTOTAL(103,A1:A100) + COUNTBLANK(A1:A100)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on How to Create Combination Charts in Excel by Maximo Sarago		</title>
		<link>https://excelzoom.com/introduction-to-combination-charts/#comment-2362</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Maximo Sarago]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2018 04:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://excelzoom.com/?p=2417#comment-2362</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Very useful thanks a Lot]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very useful thanks a Lot</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on How to Format Numbers as File Sizes by Roman Ženka		</title>
		<link>https://excelzoom.com/how-to-format-numbers-as-file-sizes/#comment-2357</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Roman Ženka]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2018 14:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://excelzoom.com/?p=797#comment-2357</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://excelzoom.com/how-to-format-numbers-as-file-sizes/#comment-2356&quot;&gt;Johan Svartklint&lt;/a&gt;.

As soon as it is size of files or RAM, the expectation is to use 1024 and not 1000. So you may display lowercase kB but nobody really does that in this context, thus confusion. If you put the KiB in, that should be 100% clear and probably the best option.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://excelzoom.com/how-to-format-numbers-as-file-sizes/#comment-2356">Johan Svartklint</a>.</p>
<p>As soon as it is size of files or RAM, the expectation is to use 1024 and not 1000. So you may display lowercase kB but nobody really does that in this context, thus confusion. If you put the KiB in, that should be 100% clear and probably the best option.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on How to Format Numbers as File Sizes by Johan Svartklint		</title>
		<link>https://excelzoom.com/how-to-format-numbers-as-file-sizes/#comment-2356</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Johan Svartklint]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2018 10:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://excelzoom.com/?p=797#comment-2356</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[No, I would argue that a kilobyte (kB) is still 1000 bytes. 1024 bytes is 1 kibibyte (KiB). The ISO/IEC 80000 lists both decimal and binary prefixes this way. However, due to JEDEC messing everything up by sanctioning the incorrect usage of decimal prefixes to designate binary multiples - everything is a bit of a mess. For example, Windows reports binary multiples using JEDEC prefixes (K, M, G) instead of the &quot;more correct&quot; (in the sense that SI is the single most internationally recognized system of units) binary prefix (Ki, Mi, Gi) set by SI and the IEC, while OS X uses the SI binary prefixes. However, in some versions Windows actually correctly uses the SI binary prefix when listing RAM, but not storage space. So I get what you mean, but I still feel the need to argue that if you want to be pedandic, and it seems like that was your whole point, then &quot;one kilobyte with a capital K&quot; is actually a kibibyte - written &quot;Ki&quot;, not &quot;K&quot;. Sure, you&#039;re welcome to use the JEDEC system, but they&#039;re not really the authority on prefixes and system of units whatever they want people to think. ^^]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, I would argue that a kilobyte (kB) is still 1000 bytes. 1024 bytes is 1 kibibyte (KiB). The ISO/IEC 80000 lists both decimal and binary prefixes this way. However, due to JEDEC messing everything up by sanctioning the incorrect usage of decimal prefixes to designate binary multiples &#8211; everything is a bit of a mess. For example, Windows reports binary multiples using JEDEC prefixes (K, M, G) instead of the &#8220;more correct&#8221; (in the sense that SI is the single most internationally recognized system of units) binary prefix (Ki, Mi, Gi) set by SI and the IEC, while OS X uses the SI binary prefixes. However, in some versions Windows actually correctly uses the SI binary prefix when listing RAM, but not storage space. So I get what you mean, but I still feel the need to argue that if you want to be pedandic, and it seems like that was your whole point, then &#8220;one kilobyte with a capital K&#8221; is actually a kibibyte &#8211; written &#8220;Ki&#8221;, not &#8220;K&#8221;. Sure, you&#8217;re welcome to use the JEDEC system, but they&#8217;re not really the authority on prefixes and system of units whatever they want people to think. ^^</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on Too Many Different Cell Formats in Excel by Anthony Giordano		</title>
		<link>https://excelzoom.com/the-mystery-of-excels-too-many-different-cell-formats/#comment-2331</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anthony Giordano]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2018 13:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://excelzoom.com/?p=289#comment-2331</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://excelzoom.com/the-mystery-of-excels-too-many-different-cell-formats/#comment-1741&quot;&gt;Arjay&lt;/a&gt;.

Genius!!!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://excelzoom.com/the-mystery-of-excels-too-many-different-cell-formats/#comment-1741">Arjay</a>.</p>
<p>Genius!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on Too Many Different Cell Formats in Excel by Arjay		</title>
		<link>https://excelzoom.com/the-mystery-of-excels-too-many-different-cell-formats/#comment-2330</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Arjay]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2018 19:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://excelzoom.com/?p=289#comment-2330</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://excelzoom.com/the-mystery-of-excels-too-many-different-cell-formats/#comment-2329&quot;&gt;james fraasch&lt;/a&gt;.

You are most welcome :-)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://excelzoom.com/the-mystery-of-excels-too-many-different-cell-formats/#comment-2329">james fraasch</a>.</p>
<p>You are most welcome :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
